RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blue Guardian vs Great Point Capital
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BLGD
Blue Guardian
GPCP
Great Point Capital
BLUE GUARDIAN
METRIC
GREAT POINT CAPITAL
55/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—43/100
3/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
—
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
1TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE1
BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS
- STEPS
- 3-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts
GREAT POINT CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
Blue Guardian PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
- +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
- +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes
Blue Guardian CONS
- −Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
- −No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison
Great Point Capital PROS
- +US-based firm may benefit from operating in a well-regulated and established financial environment.
- +Great Point Capital name suggests an institutionally oriented approach to trader funding.
- +US location may provide access to a broad range of market instruments and trading hours.
- +Presence on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public accountability and visibility.
Great Point Capital CONS
- −No trading data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
- −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry comparisons can be made.
- −Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy