RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blue Guardian vs Goat Funded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BLGD
Blue Guardian
GOAT
Goat Funded
EST. 2023
BLUE GUARDIAN
METRIC
GOAT FUNDED
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER63/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$400,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$400,000
—
MIN COST
$49
7d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER2d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS
- STEPS
- 3-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts
GOAT FUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- TradeLocker, MT5
Blue Guardian PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
- +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
- +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes
Blue Guardian CONS
- −Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
- −No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison
Goat Funded PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
Goat Funded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $400,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, though it also provides more buffer.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy