RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blue Guardian vs Funded Kingdom
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BLGD
Blue Guardian
FNKD
Funded Kingdom
BLUE GUARDIAN
METRIC
FUNDED KINGDOM
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
—
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS
- STEPS
- 3-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts
FUNDED KINGDOM DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
Blue Guardian PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
- +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
- +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes
Blue Guardian CONS
- −Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
- −No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison
Funded Kingdom PROS
- +Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
- +Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
- +Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
- +Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
Funded Kingdom CONS
- −No data was provided for this firm, making meaningful comparison impossible.
- −Traders cannot assess key metrics such as profit split, drawdown, or funding levels.
- −Lack of data represents a significant transparency concern for prospective traders.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy