RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian vs Funderpro

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BLGD
Blue Guardian
Funderpro
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
BLUE GUARDIAN
METRIC
FUNDERPRO
55/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER65/100
3/5
RATING
BETTER4.78/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
MIN COST
$79
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
PASS RATE
1
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS
3-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

Blue Guardian PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
  • +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
  • +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

  • Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
  • No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

Funderpro PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian
Lower trust score (55/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
Funderpro
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Blue Guardian Full Review →Funderpro Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy