RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blue Guardian vs Earn2Trade
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BLGD
Blue Guardian
E2TR
Earn2Trade
EST. 2016
BLUE GUARDIAN
METRIC
EARN2TRADE
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER82/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
—
MIN COST
$150
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
9%
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS
- STEPS
- 3-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts
EARN2TRADE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Sierra Chart
- TYPES
- futures, beginner
Blue Guardian PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
- +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
- +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes
Blue Guardian CONS
- −Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
- −No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison
Earn2Trade PROS
- +Founded in 2016, making it one of the most established firms in the industry
- +Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7
- +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
- +Single profit target comparison: 10% is clearly disclosed, aiding trader planning
Earn2Trade CONS
- −Reported pass rate of 9% is extremely low, meaning very few traders successfully get funded
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy