RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian vs DPFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BLGD
Blue Guardian
DPFD
DPFunded
BLUE GUARDIAN
METRIC
DPFUNDED
55/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
40/100
3/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$400,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$400,000
MIN COST
$58
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS
3-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

DPFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Commodities, Indices

Blue Guardian PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
  • +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
  • +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

  • Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
  • No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

DPFunded PROS

  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a faster route to capital.
  • +Min challenge cost of $58 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides traders with clear and predictable risk boundaries.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, accommodating algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.

DPFunded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, giving traders less room to absorb losses.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • News trading is not allowed and payout frequency is monthly, restricting strategy flexibility and delaying income.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian
Higher trust score (55/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
DPFunded
Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Blue Guardian Full Review →DPFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy