RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian vs BuoyTrade

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BLGD
Blue Guardian
BUOY
BuoyTrade
BLUE GUARDIAN
METRIC
BUOYTRADE
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$1,024,000
MIN COST
$50
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS
3-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

BUOYTRADE DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT4

Blue Guardian PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
  • +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
  • +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

  • Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
  • No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

BuoyTrade PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $50 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering a faster path to funded status.
  • +Max funding of $1,024,000 is above the industry average of $839,272.7, providing above-average scaling potential.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.

BuoyTrade CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
  • Overall drawdown of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, offering significantly less margin before breach.
  • EA/automated trading is not allowed, restricting algorithmic traders from participating with this firm.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
BuoyTrade
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Blue Guardian Full Review →BuoyTrade Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy