RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Breakout Prop vs Aqua Funded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BKPT
Breakout Prop
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
BREAKOUT PROP
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
47/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
4.33/5BETTER
RATING
—4/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$2,000,000
—
MIN COST
$1
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
2TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE2
BREAKOUT PROP DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Crypto
AQUA FUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
Breakout Prop PROS
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Breakout Prop.
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Breakout Prop.
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Breakout Prop.
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Breakout Prop.
Breakout Prop CONS
- −Almost no firm data is provided beyond crypto markets, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
- −Without profit split, funding, or payout data, traders cannot assess value against industry benchmarks.
- −Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant concern for traders making real financial decisions.
Aqua Funded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.
Aqua Funded CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
- −Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
- −Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy