RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian Futures vs WeGetFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BGFT
Blue Guardian Futures
WGFD
WeGetFunded
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES
METRIC
WEGETFUNDED
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
100%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$450,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
$84BETTER
MIN COST
$199
5d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

WEGETFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
MARKETS
Forex, Crypto, Commodities, Indices
PLATFORMS
cTrader, MT5

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
  • +Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
  • Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
  • Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

WeGetFunded PROS

  • +Overall drawdown of 4% is significantly lower than the industry average of 7.9%, limiting downside risk.
  • +Offers two well-regarded platforms, cTrader and MT5, giving traders flexible execution options.
  • +Covers four asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Commodities, and Indices for diversified trading.
  • +Min challenge cost of $199 is close to the industry average of $186.7, making entry reasonably accessible.

WeGetFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their gains.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more hoops to reach a live account.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian Futures
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.
WeGetFunded
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Blue Guardian Futures Full Review →WeGetFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy