RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian Futures vs Ment Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BGFT
Blue Guardian Futures
MNTF
Ment Funding
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES
METRIC
MENT FUNDING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
100%
PROFIT SPLIT
$450,000
MAX FUNDING
$84
MIN COST
5d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

MENT FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
  • +Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
  • Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
  • Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

Ment Funding PROS

  • +Listed on PropDNA, giving traders a reference point for discovery
  • +No restrictive data points provided that could indicate unfavorable terms
  • +Absence of negative metrics means no confirmed below-average figures
  • +Firm identity is established enough to be catalogued for comparison

Ment Funding CONS

  • No data provided on profit split, max funding, or challenge cost
  • No trading conditions such as drawdown, profit target, or payout terms are available
  • Traders cannot make an informed decision without any comparable metrics

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian Futures
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.
Ment Funding
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Blue Guardian Futures Full Review →Ment Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy