RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian Futures vs Kershner Trading Group

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BGFT

Blue Guardian Futures

KRTG

Kershner Trading Group

EST. 2001

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES

METRIC

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

100%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$450,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$84

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

+Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
+Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
+Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

−Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
−Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
−Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

Kershner Trading Group PROS

+Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
+US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
+Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
+Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

−No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
−Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
−Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian Futures

Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.

START WITH BGFT