RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian Futures vs Funding Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BGFT
Blue Guardian Futures
FNDG
Funding Traders
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES
METRIC
FUNDING TRADERS
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
100%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
$450,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
$84
MIN COST
BETTER$25
5dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
  • +Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
  • Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
  • Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

Funding Traders PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
  • +Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.

Funding Traders CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian Futures
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.
Funding Traders
Higher trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Blue Guardian Futures Full Review →Funding Traders Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy