RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian Futures vs Audacity Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BGFT
Blue Guardian Futures
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES
METRIC
AUDACITY CAPITAL
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
100%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
$450,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$84
MIN COST
BETTER$42
5d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
  • +Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
  • Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
  • Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

Audacity Capital PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.

Audacity Capital CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
  • Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian Futures
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.
Audacity Capital
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Blue Guardian Futures Full Review →Audacity Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy