RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Brightfunded vs Lux Trading Firm

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Brightfunded
BFND
Brightfunded
EST. 2023
Lux Trading Firm
LUXT
Lux Trading Firm
EST. 2019
BRIGHTFUNDED
METRIC
LUX TRADING FIRM
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
58/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
2.8/5
80%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
75%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$10,000,000
$55BETTER
MIN COST
$100
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
1
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

BRIGHTFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, DXtrade

LUX TRADING FIRM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, advanced, large-cap

Brightfunded PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $55 is well below the industry average of $186.70, lowering entry barriers
  • +Fee refund is offered, providing financial protection for traders who complete the challenge
  • +Supports three platforms — MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade — offering good platform flexibility

Brightfunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting traders who use fundamental or event-driven strategies
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential

Lux Trading Firm PROS

  • +Max funding of $10,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering elite scaling potential.
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, providing a faster path to capital.
  • +Min challenge cost of $100 is below the industry average of $186.7, keeping entry costs reasonable.
  • +Fixed drawdown type gives traders clear and stable risk parameters to plan around.

Lux Trading Firm CONS

  • Profit split of 75% is notably below the industry average of 84.7%, significantly reducing trader earnings.
  • Payout frequency is monthly, which is slower than most firms offering weekly or bi-weekly payouts.
  • News trading is not allowed and fee refund is unavailable, reducing trader flexibility and cost recovery options.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Brightfunded
Higher trust score (61/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Lux Trading Firm
Lower trust score (58/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 75% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Brightfunded Full Review →Lux Trading Firm Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy