RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Brightfunded vs Lark Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BFND

Brightfunded

EST. 2023

LRKF

Lark Funding

EST. 2022

BRIGHTFUNDED

METRIC

LARK FUNDING

61/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—59/100

5/5BETTER

RATING

—4/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$200,000TIE

MAX FUNDING

TIE$200,000

$55BETTER

MIN COST

—$200

1dTIE

PAYOUT DAYS

TIE1d

—

PASS RATE

—

1TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE1

BRIGHTFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, DXtrade

LARK FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

Brightfunded PROS

+Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $55 is well below the industry average of $186.70, lowering entry barriers
+Fee refund is offered, providing financial protection for traders who complete the challenge
+Supports three platforms — MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade — offering good platform flexibility

Brightfunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
−News trading is not allowed, restricting traders who use fundamental or event-driven strategies
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential

Lark Funding PROS

+Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
+Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.

Lark Funding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Brightfunded

Higher trust score (61/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH BFND