RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Brightfunded vs Glow Node
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BFND
Brightfunded
EST. 2023
GLWN
Glow Node
BRIGHTFUNDED
METRIC
GLOW NODE
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—47/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
—4.5/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$55
MIN COST
—
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
1—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2
BRIGHTFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, DXtrade
GLOW NODE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
Brightfunded PROS
- +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Min challenge cost of $55 is well below the industry average of $186.70, lowering entry barriers
- +Fee refund is offered, providing financial protection for traders who complete the challenge
- +Supports three platforms — MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade — offering good platform flexibility
Brightfunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting traders who use fundamental or event-driven strategies
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
Glow Node PROS
- +Based in the United Kingdom, a well-regulated financial jurisdiction offering trader protections
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
Glow Node CONS
- −Steps to funded is 2, matching the industry average of 1.6 but not below it
- −No profit split, funding cap, or payout data is available for comparison
- −Limited data makes it impossible to fully evaluate this firm against industry benchmarks
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy