RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Brightfunded vs FundedFast
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BFND
Brightfunded
EST. 2023
FNDF
FundedFast
BRIGHTFUNDED
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
66/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$55—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BRIGHTFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, DXtrade
FUNDEDFAST DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
Brightfunded PROS
- +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Min challenge cost of $55 is well below the industry average of $186.70, lowering entry barriers
- +Fee refund is offered, providing financial protection for traders who complete the challenge
- +Supports three platforms — MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade — offering good platform flexibility
Brightfunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting traders who use fundamental or event-driven strategies
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
FundedFast PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
- +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
- +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms
FundedFast CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy