RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Brightfunded vs Blue Guardian

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Brightfunded
BFND
Brightfunded
EST. 2023
BLGD
Blue Guardian
BRIGHTFUNDED
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
55/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
3/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$55
MIN COST
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
1TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE1

BRIGHTFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, DXtrade

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS
3-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

Brightfunded PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $55 is well below the industry average of $186.70, lowering entry barriers
  • +Fee refund is offered, providing financial protection for traders who complete the challenge
  • +Supports three platforms — MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade — offering good platform flexibility

Brightfunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting traders who use fundamental or event-driven strategies
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential

Blue Guardian PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
  • +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
  • +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

  • Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
  • No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

PROPDNA VERDICT

Brightfunded
Higher trust score (61/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Blue Guardian
Lower trust score (55/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Brightfunded Full Review →Blue Guardian Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy