RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Brightfunded vs Apex Trader Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BFND

Brightfunded

EST. 2023

APEX

Apex Trader Funding

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021

BRIGHTFUNDED

METRIC

APEX TRADER FUNDING

61/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—59/100

5/5BETTER

RATING

—2.75/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$300,000

$55—

MIN COST

BETTER$35

1dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—8d

—

PASS RATE

31%

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

BRIGHTFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, DXtrade

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: futures, large-cap

Brightfunded PROS

+Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $55 is well below the industry average of $186.70, lowering entry barriers
+Fee refund is offered, providing financial protection for traders who complete the challenge
+Supports three platforms — MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade — offering good platform flexibility

Brightfunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
−News trading is not allowed, restricting traders who use fundamental or event-driven strategies
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential

Apex Trader Funding PROS

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding CONS

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

PROPDNA VERDICT

Brightfunded

Higher trust score (61/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH BFND