RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Black Eagle Financial Group vs Matrix Executions

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BEFG

Black Eagle Financial Group

MTRX

Matrix Executions

EST. 2018

BLACK EAGLE FINANCIAL GROUP

METRIC

MATRIX EXECUTIONS

46/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE46/100

3.33/5—

RATING

BETTER4.2/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

3BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—2

BLACK EAGLE FINANCIAL GROUP DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Black Eagle Financial Group PROS

+A listing exists for this firm, indicating some level of industry recognition.
+Absence of restrictive data means no confirmed below-average metrics are on record.
+The firm's tag is registered, suggesting an intent to operate transparently on a comparison platform.
+No negative financial metrics are currently documented for this firm.

Black Eagle Financial Group CONS

−No data whatsoever is available for this firm, making objective evaluation impossible.
−Traders cannot compare any metrics to industry averages due to complete absence of information.
−Lack of founding date, country, and trading terms represents a significant transparency concern.

Matrix Executions PROS

+Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.

Matrix Executions CONS

−Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
−Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
−Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.

PROPDNA VERDICT