RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blueberry Futures vs Savius
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BBFU
Blueberry Futures
EST. 2025
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
BLUEBERRY FUTURES
METRIC
SAVIUS
62/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$150,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$300,000
$184BETTER
MIN COST
—$285
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER3d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Blackarrow
- TYPES
- futures
SAVIUS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- ATAS, Quantower
Blueberry Futures PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
- +Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7
Blueberry Futures CONS
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
Savius PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
- +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
- +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation
Savius CONS
- −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
- −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
- −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification
PROPDNA VERDICT
Blueberry Futures
Higher trust score (62/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy