RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blueberry Futures vs OneUp Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BBFU
Blueberry Futures
EST. 2025
OUPT
OneUp Trader
EST. 2017
BLUEBERRY FUTURES
METRIC
ONEUP TRADER
62/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—51/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$150,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$250,000
$184—
MIN COST
BETTER$125
14dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1
BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Blackarrow
- TYPES
- futures
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
Blueberry Futures PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
- +Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7
Blueberry Futures CONS
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
- +Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Blueberry Futures
Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy