RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blueberry Futures vs Nordic Funder

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BBFU

Blueberry Futures

EST. 2025

NFND

Nordic Funder

EST. 2022

BLUEBERRY FUTURES

METRIC

NORDIC FUNDER

62/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—56/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

$150,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$200,000

$184—

MIN COST

BETTER$59

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER7d

—

PASS RATE

—

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER1

BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Blackarrow
TYPES: futures

NORDIC FUNDER DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex

Blueberry Futures PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
+Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7

Blueberry Futures CONS

−EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
−News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days

Nordic Funder PROS

+Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7
+On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly alternatives
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility
+Both MT4 and MT5 are supported, covering the most widely used retail trading platforms

Nordic Funder CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blueberry Futures

Higher trust score (62/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

START WITH BBFU