RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blueberry Futures vs Kershner Trading Group
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BBFU
Blueberry Futures
EST. 2025
KRTG
Kershner Trading Group
EST. 2001
BLUEBERRY FUTURES
METRIC
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP
62/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$150,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$184
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Blackarrow
- TYPES
- futures
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
Blueberry Futures PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
- +Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7
Blueberry Futures CONS
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
Kershner Trading Group PROS
- +Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
- +US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
- +Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
- +Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.
Kershner Trading Group CONS
- −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
- −Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
- −Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Blueberry Futures
Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy