RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blueberry Futures vs Kershner Trading Group

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Blueberry Futures
BBFU
Blueberry Futures
EST. 2025
KRTG
Kershner Trading Group
EST. 2001
BLUEBERRY FUTURES
METRIC
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP
62/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
$150,000
MAX FUNDING
$184
MIN COST
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
Blackarrow
TYPES
futures

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Blueberry Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
  • +Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7

Blueberry Futures CONS

  • EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days

Kershner Trading Group PROS

  • +Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
  • +US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
  • +Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
  • +Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

  • No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
  • Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
  • Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blueberry Futures
Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
Kershner Trading Group
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Blueberry Futures Full Review →Kershner Trading Group Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy