RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blueberry Futures vs Genk Capital
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BBFU
Blueberry Futures
EST. 2025
GENK
Genk Capital
EST. 2010
BLUEBERRY FUTURES
METRIC
GENK CAPITAL
62/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$150,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$184
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Blackarrow
- TYPES
- futures
GENK CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets
Blueberry Futures PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
- +Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7
Blueberry Futures CONS
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
Genk Capital PROS
- +Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
- +Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
- +Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
- +Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.
Genk Capital CONS
- −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
- −Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
- −Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Blueberry Futures
Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy