RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blueberry Futures vs FXIFY

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Blueberry Futures
BBFU
Blueberry Futures
EST. 2025
FXIFY
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
BLUEBERRY FUTURES
METRIC
FXIFY
62/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER78/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$150,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$184—
MIN COST
BETTER$32
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
—
PASS RATE
15%
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
Blackarrow
TYPES
futures

FXIFY DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, multi-asset, fast-payout

Blueberry Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
  • +Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7

Blueberry Futures CONS

  • −EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days

FXIFY PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
  • +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.

FXIFY CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
  • −Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blueberry Futures
Lower trust score (62/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
FXIFY
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Blueberry Futures Full Review →FXIFY Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy