RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blueberry Futures vs For Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BBFU

Blueberry Futures

EST. 2025

FORT

For Traders

EST. 2023

BLUEBERRY FUTURES

METRIC

FOR TRADERS

62/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER65/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE90%

$150,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$300,000

$184—

MIN COST

BETTER$42

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER2d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Blackarrow
TYPES: futures

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade

Blueberry Futures PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
+Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7

Blueberry Futures CONS

−EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
−News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days

For Traders PROS

+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access

For Traders CONS

−Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
−News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blueberry Futures

Lower trust score (62/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

START WITH BBFU