RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blueberry Futures vs City Traders Imperium
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BBFU
Blueberry Futures
EST. 2025
CTIM
City Traders Imperium
EST. 2018
BLUEBERRY FUTURES
METRIC
CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM
62/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER78/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$150,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$4,000,000
$184—
MIN COST
BETTER$129
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
25%
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Blackarrow
- TYPES
- futures
CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, advanced, large-cap
Blueberry Futures PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
- +Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7
Blueberry Futures CONS
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
City Traders Imperium PROS
- +Max funding of $4,000,000 is vastly above the industry average of $839,272.7
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Founded in 2018, making it one of the more established firms in the industry
- +On-demand payouts provide immediate access to profits
City Traders Imperium CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
PROPDNA VERDICT
Blueberry Futures
Lower trust score (62/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
City Traders Imperium
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy