RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blueberry Futures vs Blue Guardian

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BBFU

Blueberry Futures

EST. 2025

BLGD

Blue Guardian

BLUEBERRY FUTURES

METRIC

BLUE GUARDIAN

62/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE90%

$150,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$184

MIN COST

—

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER7d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Blackarrow
TYPES: futures

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS: 3-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS: MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

Blueberry Futures PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
+Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7

Blueberry Futures CONS

−EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
−News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
+Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
+Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

−Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
−No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blueberry Futures

Higher trust score (62/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

START WITH BBFU