RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blueberry Futures vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BBFU

Blueberry Futures

EST. 2025

AQUA

Aqua Funded

EST. 2023

BLUEBERRY FUTURES

METRIC

AQUA FUNDED

62/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—54/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE90%

$150,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$184—

MIN COST

BETTER$1

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER7d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Blackarrow
TYPES: futures

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Blueberry Futures PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
+Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7

Blueberry Futures CONS

−EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
−News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days

Aqua Funded PROS

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blueberry Futures

Higher trust score (62/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

START WITH BBFU