RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blueberry Futures vs Apex Trader Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BBFU

Blueberry Futures

EST. 2025

APEX

Apex Trader Funding

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021

BLUEBERRY FUTURES

METRIC

APEX TRADER FUNDING

62/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—59/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER2.75/5

90%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE90%

$150,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$300,000

$184—

MIN COST

BETTER$35

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER8d

—

PASS RATE

31%

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Blackarrow
TYPES: futures

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: futures, large-cap

Blueberry Futures PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
+Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7

Blueberry Futures CONS

−EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
−News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days

Apex Trader Funding PROS

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding CONS

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blueberry Futures

Higher trust score (62/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

START WITH BBFU