RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blueberry Funded vs TradeLink

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Blueberry Funded
BBFD
Blueberry Funded
EST. 2024
TDLK
TradeLink
BLUEBERRY FUNDED
METRIC
TRADELINK
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$2,000,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$139
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BLUEBERRY FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade
TYPES
Beginner Friendly, Low Cost

TRADELINK DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Blueberry Funded PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing maximum trading flexibility.
  • +Wide platform selection including MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and DXtrade covers most trader preferences.
  • +Markets include stocks in addition to forex, indices, commodities, metals, and crypto, offering broad diversification.

Blueberry Funded CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller share of earnings.
  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.
  • −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost after passing.

TradeLink PROS

  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate

TradeLink CONS

  • −No firm data was provided, making any meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible
  • −Without metrics, traders cannot assess profit split, funding, drawdown, or payout terms
  • −Lack of data is itself a transparency concern for traders making real financial decisions

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blueberry Funded
Higher trust score (68/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
TradeLink
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Blueberry Funded Full Review →TradeLink Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy