Blueberry Funded vs OneUp Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | Blueberry Funded EST. 2024 | OneUp Trader EST. 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | — | 64/100 |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 80% | 90%BETTER |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 14d | 1dBETTER |
| MIN COST | $40BETTER | $65 |
| MAX FUNDING | $200,000 | $250,000BETTER |
| RATING | — | 5/5 |
| REVIEW COUNT | 0 | 2BETTER |
| STEPS | 2-step | 1-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Static/Balance-based | Trailing |
BLUEBERRY FUNDED DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto, Stocks
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade
- TYPES
- Beginner Friendly, Low Cost
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
Blueberry Funded PROS
- +Overall drawdown allowance is 10%, above the listed firms' average of 7.9%, giving traders more room before breaching limits.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $40 is below the listed firms' average of $69.4, making entry more affordable.
- +Five trading platforms available including MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and DXtrade, offering broad platform choice.
- +Six asset classes supported including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto, and Stocks.
Blueberry Funded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the listed firms' average of 83.2%, meaning traders keep less of their earnings.
- −Payout window of 14 days is longer than the listed firms' average of 9.6 days, delaying access to profits.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is below the listed firms' average of $310,294.1, limiting overall earning potential.
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the average of 83.2% across listed firms.
- +Payout window of 1 day is well below the average of 9.6 days across listed firms.
- +Only 1 evaluation step required, below the average of 1.6 steps across listed firms.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the average of 8.1% across listed firms, making it easier to pass.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Max funding of $250,000 is below the average of $310,294.1 across listed firms.
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the average of 7.9% across listed firms, leaving less room for loss.
- −Weekend holding and news trading are both prohibited, restricting trading flexibility.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Blueberry Funded
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts (14d). 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Risk
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Commissions never affect rankings or Trust Scores, which follow our published methodology.Privacy Policy