RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blueberry Funded vs Lucid Trading
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BBFD
Blueberry Funded
EST. 2024
LCDT
Lucid Trading
BLUEBERRY FUNDED
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$2,000,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$139—
MIN COST
BETTER$90
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BLUEBERRY FUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto, Stocks
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade
- TYPES
- Beginner Friendly, Low Cost
LUCID TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower
Blueberry Funded PROS
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing maximum trading flexibility.
- +Wide platform selection including MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and DXtrade covers most trader preferences.
- +Markets include stocks in addition to forex, indices, commodities, metals, and crypto, offering broad diversification.
Blueberry Funded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller share of earnings.
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.
- −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost after passing.
Lucid Trading PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
- +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower
Lucid Trading CONS
- −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures
PROPDNA VERDICT
Blueberry Funded
Higher trust score (68/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy