RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blueberry Funded vs Kershner Trading Group

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BBFD

Blueberry Funded

EST. 2024

KRTG

Kershner Trading Group

EST. 2001

BLUEBERRY FUNDED

METRIC

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP

68/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$2,000,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$139

MIN COST

—

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

BLUEBERRY FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade
TYPES: Beginner Friendly, Low Cost

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Blueberry Funded PROS

+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing maximum trading flexibility.
+Wide platform selection including MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and DXtrade covers most trader preferences.
+Markets include stocks in addition to forex, indices, commodities, metals, and crypto, offering broad diversification.

Blueberry Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller share of earnings.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost after passing.

Kershner Trading Group PROS

+Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
+US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
+Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
+Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

−No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
−Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
−Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blueberry Funded

Higher trust score (68/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH BBFD