Compare/Blueberry Funded vs FTMO

Blueberry Funded vs FTMO

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BLUEBERRY FUNDED DETAILS

MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

+Overall drawdown allowance is 10%, above the listed firms' average of 7.9%, giving traders more room before breaching limits.
+Minimum challenge cost of $40 is below the listed firms' average of $69.4, making entry more affordable.
+Five trading platforms available including MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and DXtrade, offering broad platform choice.
+Six asset classes supported including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto, and Stocks.

−Profit split of 80% is below the listed firms' average of 83.2%, meaning traders keep less of their earnings.
−Payout window of 14 days is longer than the listed firms' average of 9.6 days, delaying access to profits.
−Max funding of $200,000 is below the listed firms' average of $310,294.1, limiting overall earning potential.

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
+Fee refund is available
+Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
+Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
+A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
−News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

Blueberry Funded

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts (14d). 80% profit split.

FTMO

Trust score 65/100. Faster payouts (14d). 80% profit split.