RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blueberry Funded vs For Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BBFD

Blueberry Funded

EST. 2024

FORT

For Traders

EST. 2023

BLUEBERRY FUNDED

METRIC

FOR TRADERS

68/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—65/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$2,000,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$300,000

$139—

MIN COST

BETTER$42

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER2d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

BLUEBERRY FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade
TYPES: Beginner Friendly, Low Cost

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade

Blueberry Funded PROS

+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing maximum trading flexibility.
+Wide platform selection including MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and DXtrade covers most trader preferences.
+Markets include stocks in addition to forex, indices, commodities, metals, and crypto, offering broad diversification.

Blueberry Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller share of earnings.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost after passing.

For Traders PROS

+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access

For Traders CONS

−Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
−News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blueberry Funded

Higher trust score (68/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH BBFD