RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blueberry Funded vs Funded Futures Network
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BBFD
Blueberry Funded
EST. 2024
FFNT
Funded Futures Network
EST. 2022
BLUEBERRY FUNDED
METRIC
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$2,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$250,000
$139—
MIN COST
BETTER$81
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BLUEBERRY FUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto, Stocks
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade
- TYPES
- Beginner Friendly, Low Cost
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower
Blueberry Funded PROS
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing maximum trading flexibility.
- +Wide platform selection including MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and DXtrade covers most trader preferences.
- +Markets include stocks in addition to forex, indices, commodities, metals, and crypto, offering broad diversification.
Blueberry Funded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller share of earnings.
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.
- −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost after passing.
Funded Futures Network PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
- +Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
Funded Futures Network CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
- −Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Blueberry Funded
Higher trust score (68/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Funded Futures Network
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy