RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blueberry Funded vs BuoyTrade

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Blueberry Funded
BBFD
Blueberry Funded
EST. 2024
BUOY
BuoyTrade
BLUEBERRY FUNDED
METRIC
BUOYTRADE
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$2,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$1,024,000
$139
MIN COST
BETTER$50
14dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE14d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BLUEBERRY FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade
TYPES
Beginner Friendly, Low Cost

BUOYTRADE DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT4

Blueberry Funded PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing maximum trading flexibility.
  • +Wide platform selection including MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and DXtrade covers most trader preferences.
  • +Markets include stocks in addition to forex, indices, commodities, metals, and crypto, offering broad diversification.

Blueberry Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller share of earnings.
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.
  • No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost after passing.

BuoyTrade PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $50 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering a faster path to funded status.
  • +Max funding of $1,024,000 is above the industry average of $839,272.7, providing above-average scaling potential.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.

BuoyTrade CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
  • Overall drawdown of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, offering significantly less margin before breach.
  • EA/automated trading is not allowed, restricting algorithmic traders from participating with this firm.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blueberry Funded
Higher trust score (68/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
BuoyTrade
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Blueberry Funded Full Review →BuoyTrade Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy