RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs RebelsFunding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD
ATFunded
RBLS
RebelsFunding
EST. 2023
ATFUNDED
METRIC
REBELSFUNDING
54/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
42/100
2.92/5
RATING
BETTER3/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$320,000
$49
MIN COST
BETTER$9
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
1

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

REBELSFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
4-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

RebelsFunding PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
  • +Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.

RebelsFunding CONS

  • Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
  • Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
  • Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded
Higher trust score (54/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
RebelsFunding
Lower trust score (42/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ATFunded Full Review →RebelsFunding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy