RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs OspreyFX

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD
ATFunded
OSPX
OspreyFX
ATFUNDED
METRIC
OSPREYFX
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$49
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

OSPREYFX DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • −Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

OspreyFX PROS

  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate

OspreyFX CONS

  • −No trading metrics were provided, preventing any meaningful comparison to industry averages
  • −Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is a low-regulation jurisdiction, raising oversight concerns
  • −Absence of profit split, funding cap, or payout data limits trader due diligence

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
OspreyFX
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

ATFunded Full Review →OspreyFX Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy