RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs Mako Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD

ATFunded

MKOT

Mako Trading

ATFUNDED

METRIC

MAKO TRADING

54/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—50/100

2.92/5—

RATING

BETTER4.5/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$200,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$49

MIN COST

—

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

4TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE4

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

MAKO TRADING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

ATFunded PROS

+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
+EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
+Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
+Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

Mako Trading PROS

+No data is available on profit split, funding, or cost metrics for this firm
+No data is available on drawdown or profit target for this firm
+No data is available on payout timing or steps to funded for this firm
+No data is available on platforms, markets, or founding date for this firm

Mako Trading CONS

−Virtually no data is provided, making any objective evaluation impossible
−Traders cannot compare this firm's terms to the industry average of 84.7% profit split
−Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant risk for traders making financial decisions

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded

Higher trust score (54/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ATFD