RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs MyFlashFunding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD
ATFunded
MFFL
MyFlashFunding
ATFUNDED
METRIC
MYFLASHFUNDING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$49
MIN COST
BETTER$15
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

MYFLASHFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, Sway Charts

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

MyFlashFunding PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $15 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
  • +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility for accessing profits.

MyFlashFunding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Profit target of 15% is well above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation significantly harder to pass.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
MyFlashFunding
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ATFunded Full Review →MyFlashFunding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy