RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs Lucid Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD

ATFunded

LCDT

Lucid Trading

ATFUNDED

METRIC

LUCID TRADING

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$200,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$49BETTER

MIN COST

—$90

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER1d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

ATFunded PROS

+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
+EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
+Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
+Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

Lucid Trading PROS

+Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
+Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
+Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

−No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
−Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
−Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded

Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ATFD