RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs Glow Node

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD

ATFunded

GLWN

Glow Node

ATFUNDED

METRIC

GLOW NODE

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER60/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3.5/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$200,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$49

MIN COST

—

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

GLOW NODE DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase

ATFunded PROS

+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
+EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
+Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
+Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

Glow Node PROS

+Based in the United Kingdom, a well-regulated financial jurisdiction offering trader protections
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Glow Node CONS

−Steps to funded is 2, matching the industry average of 1.6 but not below it
−No profit split, funding cap, or payout data is available for comparison
−Limited data makes it impossible to fully evaluate this firm against industry benchmarks

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded

Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ATFD