RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs FXIFY

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD
ATFunded
FXIFY
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
ATFUNDED
METRIC
FXIFY
54/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER78/100
2.92/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$49—
MIN COST
BETTER$32
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
—
PASS RATE
15%
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

FXIFY DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, multi-asset, fast-payout

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • −Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

FXIFY PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
  • +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.

FXIFY CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
  • −Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded
Lower trust score (54/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
FXIFY
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ATFunded Full Review →FXIFY Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy