RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs For Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD

ATFunded

FORT

For Traders

EST. 2023

ATFUNDED

METRIC

FOR TRADERS

54/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER58/100

2.92/5—

RATING

BETTER3/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$300,000

$49—

MIN COST

BETTER$42

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER2d

—

PASS RATE

—

4BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—1

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade

ATFunded PROS

+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
+EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
+Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
+Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

For Traders PROS

+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access

For Traders CONS

−Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
−News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded

Lower trust score (54/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ATFD