RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs Funded Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD
ATFunded
FNDT
Funded Traders
ATFUNDED
METRIC
FUNDED TRADERS
54/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
40/100
2.92/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$600,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
$489
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

FUNDED TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
PLATFORMS
Match-Trader, DXTrade, cTrader

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

Funded Traders PROS

  • +Overall drawdown of 8% is close to the industry average of 7.9%, representing a balanced risk threshold.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides predictable and clearly defined risk limits for traders.
  • +News trading is allowed, supporting a broader range of active trading strategies.
  • +Multiple platforms including Match-Trader, DXTrade, and cTrader offer flexibility in trading environment.

Funded Traders CONS

  • Min challenge cost of $489 is drastically above the industry average of $186.7, making entry significantly more expensive.
  • Key data including profit split, days to first payout, and payout frequency are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to complete.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded
Higher trust score (54/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Funded Traders
Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

ATFunded Full Review →Funded Traders Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy