RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs Funding Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD
ATFunded
FNDG
Funding Traders
ATFUNDED
METRIC
FUNDING TRADERS
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$49
MIN COST
BETTER$25
14dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE14d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

Funding Traders PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
  • +Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.

Funding Traders CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Funding Traders
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ATFunded Full Review →Funding Traders Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy