RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
ATFunded vs Funding Traders
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
ATFD
ATFunded
FNDG
Funding Traders
ATFUNDED
METRIC
FUNDING TRADERS
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$49—
MIN COST
BETTER$25
14dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
ATFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks
ATFunded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
- +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
- +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
- +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.
ATFunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.
Funding Traders PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
- +Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.
Funding Traders CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
- −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy