RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs Funderpro

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD

ATFunded

FDRP

Funderpro

EST. 2023

ATFUNDED

METRIC

FUNDERPRO

54/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER65/100

2.92/5—

RATING

BETTER4.78/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$200,000TIE

MAX FUNDING

TIE$200,000

$49BETTER

MIN COST

—$79

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER1d

—

PASS RATE

—

4BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—3

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

ATFunded PROS

+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
+EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
+Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
+Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

Funderpro PROS

+Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded

Lower trust score (54/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ATFD